Enter your email address to receive updates when we publish new posts.
For the love of (seed) money
When I talk to fellow Boiseans about what's needed to jump start our local tech ecosystem, we all agree that we have all the right pieces.
Boise has great entrepreneurs. We have great companies, ranging from the big guys down to the fresh start-up. We have good support organizations and service providers. We have talented people and are attracting new people with great experience from the more tech developed coastal areas. We even have readily accessible early stage funding. What we are lacking is true seed level funding.
Fund raising has never been easy, and right now it is especially difficult. Not so long ago an entrepreneur could pull some money out of saving or use some of their home equity to fund the idea. Those aren't really options anymore for most.
And even when the economy stabilizes and the traditional funding avenues ease up, we are still going to have a gap. How does the engineer who recently finds themselves out of work fund that great idea they've been sitting on?
Funding Options:
Boise Angel Alliance - BAA is a great group of accredited investors with a wealth of experience. The main focus of BAA has shifted from a group of individual investors to a fund.
Boise Angel Fund - BAF is a brand new fund. From what I understand, BAF raised a little under 1 Million for their first fund and is associated with the RAIN Fund Network. In most markets Angel investors are the place to go for pre-revenue, early stage funding. The problem is that BAA and BAF don't seem that interested in pre-revenue companies:
We typically invest in businesses that are generating revenue, and can provide customer references. If companies are pre-revenue, they must be prepared to demonstrate the market viability of their offering.
Keiretsu Forum - Keiretsu is like BAA but on steroids. They have Angel networks all across the west and several overseas. Keiretsu has already funded substantial deals here locally. Both PakSense and Banshee River Boards raised money comparable to what you would get from early stage VC funding. The biggest problem for pre-revenue companies is that it's a pay-to-play model and in order to present you need to pay $6K to get in the door.
Highway 12 Ventures - VC's don't typically do seed funding. This isn't because they aren't interested. In fact smaller funds like Highway 12 want to talk to start-ups as early as possible. It's just that VC money is *expensive*. VC's are fund managers. At the end of their fund they have to return a profit to their investors. This means you have a relatively short window of time to launch, scale, and exit (either by being acquired or going public) before the fund is due. Very few businesses can do this starting at pre-revenue. However if you are pre-revenue and have the right idea, Highway 12 is probably your best bet here in Boise. (Full disclose, I am the EIR at Highway 12 Ventures)
Individual Angels - There are several individual Angel Investors in Idaho. They aren't aligned with BAA or Keiretsu and unless you know who they are, or know someone who know's them, they are very hard to find.
Government Grants - If you have the right type of business there are a lot of government funding opportunities out there. But you have to have the right type of business, and often new pre-revenue companies are at a serious disadvantage to the established players who know how to work the system. We have had some success here and here. If you're interested in this option the crew at TechConnect can help you out.
Unlike some people, I don't think Boise needs more Investment Capital, with one exception: Pre-revenue seed funding.
I have talked with a lot of people about this. I think this would be one of the easier challenges we have to fix. I have some ideas, but no real solution yet. I think if one person, with the right connections (aka interested investors) were to be the champion behind this we could get something done pretty quickly.
So if you're interested in solving this problem shoot me an email tac@techboise.com.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Categories:
Recent comments
- Unreasonable
1 week 2 days ago - way to go!!!
1 week 6 days ago - RE: is there another Kickstand Speed Dating planned
2 weeks 1 day ago - re: is there another kickstand speed dating planned
2 weeks 1 day ago - is there another kickstand speed dating planned
2 weeks 1 day ago - Great Question!
2 weeks 1 day ago - Is it an all day event?
2 weeks 1 day ago - I'm planning on bringing a
2 weeks 2 days ago - Grape iMac
2 weeks 2 days ago - RE: yes
2 weeks 2 days ago
Monthly archive
- June, 2009 (28)
- May, 2009 (17)
- April, 2009 (12)
- March, 2009 (21)
- February, 2009 (19)
- January, 2009 (20)
- December, 2008 (6)
- November, 2008 (12)
- October, 2008 (14)
- September, 2008 (10)
- August, 2008 (9)
- July, 2008 (32)
- June, 2008 (11)
- May, 2008 (8)
- April, 2008 (12)
- March, 2008 (14)
- February, 2008 (7)
- January, 2008 (9)
- December, 2007 (8)
- November, 2007 (12)
- October, 2007 (15)
- September, 2007 (11)
- August, 2007 (12)
- July, 2007 (20)
- June, 2007 (12)
- May, 2007 (27)
- April, 2007 (3)
- March, 2007 (1)
- February, 2007 (2)
- January, 2007 (1)

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=e9298874-38f8-4e7e-a793-81dc26810a9f)
Comments
Sorry I'm late to this
Sorry I'm late to this thread; Tac & I have discussed the lack of *meaningful* early stage funding options in Boise and I agree wholeheartedly. I'm an Amazon vet with a couple of start-ups under my belt ... including one I'm trying to get funded now. The early-stage options in Boise are pretty limited and/or unattractive. (From what I've seen recently, they aren't terribly better in Seattle either so some of it is clearly macro-related.) I have so many thoughts about this that are really beyond the scope of a blog comment. (Tac -- I'll send you an article and hopefully you can throw it up.)
It's not only a regional
It's not only a regional thing. . even here in the valley there are very few institutional funds that consistently practice the seed approach. This is a big problem for the startup ecosystem. We do at True, and we're always interested in out of the valley seed exposure. We've historically done a lot in SLC and Boulder. I'd love to hear more about what's interesting in Boise.
Entrepreneurs should also
Entrepreneurs should also contact Frontier Angels http://frontierangels.com/ Their membership includes Bill Payne who's an outstanding expert and great guy to work with. If you want to save a lot of time and frustration, ask him to review your model: "The Venture Analysis by Bill Payne" http://matr.net/article-24741.html
Tac, While your premise that
Tac,
While your premise that most VC firms don't invest as early as they used to has some merit, I'd like to clarify Highway 12 Ventures' view on funding pre-revenue companies. Our last investment in a Boise company was M2E Power. Not only were they pre-revenue, they were at least a year away from revenue and only had three full-time employees when we invested.
I think the reason you see VC's doing less seed deals these days is not about the duration you mention above, but more about the lack of value created between seed and early-stage as it relates to the increase in valuation between those stages. VC's haven't been rewarded for being early, in fact more often than not, they're being punished by their colleagues in subsequent rounds because of that lack of value creation in that time period.
But there are plenty of firms still investing in "two guys and an idea in a garage" and we're actively looking for those opportunities.
Thanks, Mark
Russ, thanks for the
Russ, thanks for the resource.
Mark, thanks for the clarification.
Interesting item recently in
Interesting item recently in TechCrunch--
http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/07/seattles-top-entrepreneurs-band-tog...
[...] Blog with an excellent
[...] Blog with an excellent post detailing Idaho venture capital firms/options: For the love of (seed) money Print This Post | Email This Post | | Subscribe via [...]
In deference to Mark and Russ
In deference to Mark and Russ I agree with Tac's line of thought and he is exactly on target. There really is very little available for early stage companies in the state and this is a very serious problem. I heard another pitch this morning for another $50 to $100 million VC fund and all I could do was shake my head. Where do the deals for those entities mentioned above come from? Magic? Luck? This same situation exists for the state's universities and the INL for lots of their ideas. It is a big problem. Until we can find a solution we will miss some great opportunities. BTW, there are solutions to situations like this in other states and it is very doable. Yes, they are risky and many of them will never make it to Mark, or K4 or the Alliance but this is a numbers game and there are ways to move the numbers in our favor. Is a business that returns LESS than 3x to 5x in three to five years a crappy business??? Is a business/idea that only needs $200K or less a bad investment? Yes, we need a dedicated seed fund!!!